Health indicators in Brazil have shown great progress over the
last 50 years. The average life expectancy of Brazilians has increased
considerably. Infant mortality rates, although they are still
high by both world and Latin American standards, are almost four
times lower than they were at the beginning of the 1940s.
The morbidity
structure and the mortality profile have undergone substantial
changes. The main causes of death, earlier centred around the
so-called communicable diseases are today to be found, with increased
urbanization, among chronic-degenerative diseases (cardiovascular
problems and tumours) and in external causes such as accidents
and homicides, both resulting to a large extent from daily life
in large cities.
This does not
mean that communicable diseases have disappeared. They continue
to exist, although concentrated in particular pockets of rural
poverty and associated in large measure with migratory movements,
notably in the North-east, North and Central East regions. The
North-east for example still shows high infant mortality rates,
especially related to the poor state of nutrition of a high proportion
of children and newborn babies. The return of endemic diseases
which had been eradicated such as cholera, and the emergence of
new ones, such as Aids,
are new characteristics of our disease profile, requiring new
forms of preventive action from the government.
In spite of the
progress seen, Brazil still shows regional differences in its
health indicators. Regions such as the North-east have sickness
patterns which are very similar to those of the most backward
countries of Africa, Asia and Latin America. Whereas the states
of the South, South-east and the Federal District, where, in spite
of the internal dissimilarity of the indicators, health conditions
are to be found that are similar to those of many developed countries.
The structure of the health system in Brazil has changed a great deal
in the last 30 years. Until the 60s there was a division of labour
between the Health
Ministry and the former Institutes of Retirement and Pensions (AIPs). The former took
care of community health, the logistics of vaccine distribution
and medical but basic care for the low income population in the
regions where the government was not able to offer a service of
better quality. Whereas the IAPs concentrated on providing medical
care to workers in certain professional categories and their families,
covered by welfare protection.
After the 60s,
there was a growing trend towards the expansion of the cover of the health system for the Brazilian
population. In 1967, the former AIPs were brought together as
the Instituto Nacional de Previdência Social (INPS) [National
Social Welfare Institute], which included, for the purposes of
medical care, all workers with an approved work permit, as well
as the self-employed who wished to contribute to social welfare.
In 1976 the Instituto
Nacional de Assistência Médica da Previdência Social (Inamps)
[National Medical Care for Social Welfare Institute] was created
as the body responsible for all medical care to the population
dependent on workers in formal employment. Over the 70s and 80s,
the non-contributing population segments incorporated into the
health system, such as rural and poor people, expanded and there
were also strategies for decentralization linked to the programmes
for expanding the cover.
The Constitution
of 1988 instituted the Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) [Single Health System], which set
as its goal universal cover of the entire Brazilian population,
in the pattern of the traditional systems of social welfare existing
in the European countries which took the route of setting up a
welfare state.
The course taken
by the Brazilian health system has however continued to reveal
some basic problems which still need to be resolved. The financing of the health sector in the country has been insufficient
to cover the aims of universality, completeness and fairness.
In the country little is spent on health and spent badly, whilst
a great deal of the financial effort of the sector has not been
channelled towards the most needy segments of the population.
Consequently, there exists a serious deficit and gaps in the cover of the Brazilian health system.
At the beginning
of the 90s there was a serious institutional and financial crisis
in the health sector in Brazil, which brought as a corollary a
fall in the quality and cover of the public health system. Along
with this, the trend for the SUS to become in practice a system
devoted to caring for the lowest income social groups, whereas
the middle and higher income classes were able to rely on the
so-called private supplementary medicine systems which were expanding at
a fairly rapid rate. Nowadays these systems cover around 35 million
people, notably workers employed in the larger firms and middle
and upper class families.
In spite of being
a health system financed to a large extent by the public sector,
via a system of insurance payment called AIH, the structure of supply of health services in Brazil is predominantly
private. A high proportion of hospital institutions and beds belong
to the private sector, with the responsibility for the health
clinics (health posts and centres) remaining with the public sector,
especially in the poorer regions of the country.
Brazil also has
a structure of human resources in health which is growing fast. It can be said
that the number of professionals of this area has grown considerably
in recent years, but the composition of the health teams is still
inadequate, insofar as it centres on the doctor and the nursing
attendant, the latter without basic training. It is becoming necessary
to increase the interdisciplinary nature of health teams and to
increase, in their internal composition, the level of vital categories
such as professionally trained nurses, both at higher and medium
level.
In its initial
years of operation the SUS did not show satisfactory results.
This was for no other reason than that the system was undergoing
reforms established progressively by the Health Ministry. The
reforms were increasingly aimed at decentralization, with an increase
in the autonomy of states and municipalities in the setting up
of structures to provide health services appropriate to the circumstances
of each situation.
The changes were
also aimed at the need to define health priorities which would
enable the major problems of the population to be balanced, alongside
the provision of information systems which would make the results
obtained and the expenditure required to achieve them more transparent.
Many of the public and private hospitals in Brazil do not have
computer systems to enable them to obtain financial and accounting
data on the costs of the main procedures.
The reforms still
need to be based on new mechanisms of administration and management
which will allow greater autonomy for the hospitals and health
service networks in personnel management and in the organisation
of the supply in order to fill the needs of each region.
The Health Ministry
and federal government - in partnership with the states and municipalities
- are constantly in search of new definitions which will enable
the Brazilian health system to achieve greater efficiency and
attain the objectives of universal cover and equality. The main
challenge is to administer the scant resources available appropriately
so that they can fulfil needs and deficiencies, especially for
the poorest sections of the population. |